3D model of butterfly can opener


In response to Gary Hustwit's documentary, Objectified, I decided upon making a 3d model of a can opener. Specifically a butterfly can opener, rather than the popular manual or bunker can openers. One particular line near the beginning stuck out to me. Dieter Rams said, "in my experience, users react very positively when things are clear and understandable... that's what particularly bothers me today, the arbitrariness and thoughtlessness with which many things are produced and brought to market." (11:40) This immediately made me think of the can opener that my roommate had, which we couldn't figure out for the life of us how to use. Only with the assistance of a few google searches was I able to use it.


Furthermore, I found that the can opener wasn't very user friendly. Upon using it, my hands hurt and I was thinking they might cramp. Dan Formosa said, "what we really need to do to design is look at the extremes... if we can understand what the extremes are, the middle will take care of itself." (6:13) Similar to David Stowell's example of his friend's wife having a hard time with a potato peeler due to arthritis, the can opener wasn't very friendly to me, being the average person and it would do doubt be a struggle for the weaker side of the extremes. His idea of rubberizing the handle could easily be applied to other kitchen tools, but as Rams stated, many things are made with thoughtlessness.    


Last but not least, Japanese designer Naoto Fukasawa made me think about how the best designs are ones that we don't think about. His example of how we best use a pen when we're not thinking about it applies to many other objects. With the butterfly can opener, the fact that I had to figure it out and concentrate on how to work with it took away from my experience of actually using it. Fukasawa stated, "design needs to be plugged into natural behavior." I couldn't help but think that it was needlessly difficult to use but when using a regular manual can opener I need to put no thought and little effort into the action because it was designed in such a way that felt natural to me. After watching the documentary, my biggest take away from it was the idea that design is meant to be constantly improving people's lives. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Algorithmic Surface Modelling + Animation

Image
Tile design: Test Shapes: To experiment with tiling, I initially tried using a cylinder and a shape similar to the class demo to make sure my algorithm works. For my animation, I tried to tesselate my design to a series of lofted polygons, but I found that when I tried to input the loft into the surface morph, it gave me an error saying "1 value inherited from 1 source... Null". It didn't matter whether or not the loft was connected to the rotate axis (between polygon and loft) and I couldn't manage to make it work even when using mesh brep or the brep parameter. Even baking this surface did not help.  I found that using this shape gave me two main errors: 1. Divide Domain: Data Conversion failed from Brep to Domain²  2. Surface morph: Data Conversion failed from Brep to Surface Putting mesh brep between brep and divide domain² helped, but it still had errors regarding the V domain values being 0. Oddly enough, this exact same algorithm worked when I replaced polygon
Read more

Parametric Structure & Animation

Image
In class tutorial animation: My own spin: I found that it was a really straightforward process, especially since I've had experience already with making short animated gifs. What I found to be really nice was that instead of a choppy gif made up of 3 or 4 screenshots, I was able to create something really smooth. I also found that rhino's naming structure for saving the .png files made it so I didn't need to worry about organizing 180 or so individual images. The hardest part was thinking up a new object to create and when I did, I found that I had to make individual brep's and play around with positioning a lot.
Read more

Algorithmic Surface Model for SLA Printing

Image
Revised Design in bounding box: Some feedback I got from the class was to consider the direction that my design is going towards. In particular, which way the "arrow" part of my design faced. I decided that I liked it with the box shape facing up. One critique was to improve the support for the corners, specifically the way some intersections hang with little support. Because I'm using a lattice structure, Bryan mentioned that I could deal with delicate parts by increasing the thickness of the print or else I could use an underlying form as a support structure. Since we will be using clear resin, I plan to use this feedback to create a low relief design for final print using an underlying form. Along with the feedback regarding structure, it was mentioned that the way I set up my piece made it so that new iterations would be fast without changing the surface design. This came with the idea to explore more forms. Overall, I made 14 shapes using the revolve tool in rhino, b
Read more